A couple of weeks ago, I published a list of the 253 most-cited works since 1900 in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (The SEP had 1778 main-page entries as of my scrape last summer, and many of those entries have long reference lists.) Citation in the SEP is plausibly a better measure of impact in mainstream Anglophone philosophy than other bibliometric measures like Google Scholar and SCOPUS, which include citations by non-philosophical sources (which can dominate citations within philosophy, since philosophy is overall a
"Anglophone" is probably the better descriptor of the sociological category rather than "analytic". If there were lots of cross-language citations in a methodological tradition based on analytic methods, then "analytic" would be the more accurate term. On the insularity of Anglophone philosophy, see: https://faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzAbs/Anglophone.htm
As someone casually interested in analytic philosophy these posts have been useful in filling in some of the gaps in my library
Why did you prefer to call it Anglophone philosophy rather than Analytical philosophy?
"Anglophone" is probably the better descriptor of the sociological category rather than "analytic". If there were lots of cross-language citations in a methodological tradition based on analytic methods, then "analytic" would be the more accurate term. On the insularity of Anglophone philosophy, see: https://faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzAbs/Anglophone.htm